The key concern of Tobacco Control would be to supply a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which are more likely to further the objectives of the comprehensive tobacco control policy. In documents submitted for review the introduction should suggest why the study reported or problems discussed are very important with regards to managing tobacco use, while the conversation part will include an analysis of how a research reported plays a role in tobacco control goals.

Documents firmly anchored to a policy that is strategic programme context are more inclined to be accepted for book. Once the log seeks to attain a worldwide readership, writers must look into whether their intended submissions target problems or themes, which are probably be of great interest to scientists involved in other countries. Extremely parochial dilemmas, that incorporate few classes for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are unlikely to be provided with priority that is high. The manuscripts editors will generally maybe not offer priority that is high:

• Studies of smoking cigarettes prevalence and its own correlates. They are well ideal to journals that are national. Few individuals residing outside nation have an interest in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette cigarette smokers.
• Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of particular populace teams or health care professionals. Once again, they are better suited to national journals or even wellness expert speciality journals. Few individuals in other nations could be enthusiastic about (for instance) whether nurses in a hospital that is regional thinking about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and people using such studies into initial areas are of more interest.
• Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are documents with findings that appear to hold no apparent value for changing policy or training in tobacco control. They often times show methodological finery, but don’t take us anywhere crucial or interesting.
• Advice pieces where in actuality the views are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or disregard for essential ethical problems in favor of sloganeering.
• Documents that show the writers have not opened Tobacco Control plus don’t understand its primary give attention to tobacco control in place of on tobacco and its particular usage and wellness effects. We have been enthusiastic about such documents, but as long as their writers address the implications of the findings for tobacco control.
• Papers with glaringly apparent, deadly problems that are methodological.
• Documents on topics that need extremely technical or discipline-specific language not likely to be recognized because of the most of visitors.
• Documents that are replications of currently well-established findings or provide little new information.
• Regional studies where in fact the implications for the journal’s audience that is international not clear.
• Reports written for governments or neighborhood wellness authorities that some body thought could be provided an instant make-over and presented as a log paper.

Editorial policy

Tobacco Control adheres to your greatest criteria concerning its editorial policies on book ethics, systematic misconduct, permission and peer review criteria. To see all BMJ Journal policies please relate to the BMJ Author Hub policies web page.

Articles are posted under a special licence or non-exclusive licence for British Crown workers or where BMJ has agreed CC BY is applicable. The terms are as stated in accordance with our licence terms for US Federal Government officers or employees acting as part of their official duties. Writers or their employers retain copyright. Open access articles could be reused underneath the regards to the appropriate innovative Commons licence to facilitate reuse for the content; please relate to the Tobacco Control Author Licence for the Creative that is applicable commons.

Tobacco industry funded work

Tobacco Control will likely not give consideration to for book documents work that is reporting, in entire or in component, by a tobacco business or tobacco industry company. Nor will the journal consider papers by writers whom accept tobacco industry financing, including money for research expenses, for several or section of any author’s income, or other kinds of individual remuneration. For more info, please check this out editorial providing the thinking behind the journal’s policy. Failure to declare interests that are competing submission, or whenever a write-up is commissioned, can lead to instant rejection of this paper. If your interest that is competing to light after book, Tobacco Control will issue an official modification to or retraction for the entire paper, as appropriate.

Material previously published online

Tobacco Control is essay writers happy to give consideration to documents based wholly or perhaps in component on material previously published on line. Nonetheless writers should consider an editorial with this topic: Prior publication on the net: new log policy. The editor keeps the customary straight to make modifications however you like if essential to reduce, because of the approval associated with the author(s), product accepted for publication. Any written or illustrative product that happens to be posted somewhere else needs to be duly recognized and followed closely by the penned consent for the copyright owner (this can be the publisher as opposed to the writer).

Fast monitoring

Under unique circumstances where a paper’s findings have actually instantly relevant policy implications warranting urgent book, manuscripts could be fast tracked prior to the normal queue of documents. If you feel you feel it is of sufficient importance to be handled urgently that you have good reasons why this is true for your paper, please detail these in a cover letter, explaining the importance of your work for the field and the reason. This demand doesn’t guarantee that the editors will concur, and just a few documents per year should be expedited with this foundation, nonetheless it can help the editors to judge the paper’s value within the context that is current.

Formatting, terms and revised manuscripts

Papers on electric cigarettes should utilize the term cigarettes that are‘electronic on very first usage, after which it the abbreviation ‘e-cigarettes’ may be applied. Documents on other smoking distribution systems may continue to make use of the word ‘electronic smoking distribution systems’ accompanied by the abbreviation ‘ENDS’ after very very first usage.

When uploading a revised manuscript, writers also needs to consist of a split manuscript file showcasing the tracked changes to demonstrate the editors the distinction through the version that is previous. The tracked modifications document must certanly be uploaded as a supplementary file.

Analysis gu > that is reporting

BMJ calls for conformity into the reporting that is following. Please upload the appropriate finished list for your research type along with your distribution, and label it “Research checklist”. This can be indicated on the submission form if no relevant checklist is available for your study type.

CONSORT statement – necessary for all randomised controlled studies
PRISMA statement – necessary for all systematic reviews
EVEREST statement – Required for many financial evaluations
STARD statement – Required for several diagnostic research papers
STROBE statement – necessary for all observational studies
SQUIRE statement – Required for several quality enhancement studies

Guidance and types can be obtained from EQUATOR.

We video that is welcome to come with accepted research articles. These enable authors to really talk through their work beyond the limitations of the article that is formal improve the user’s understanding. Note that individuals will likely not request you to think about publishing a video clip abstract until your paper happens to be accepted. Please don’t attempt to upload a video clip abstract upon initial distribution of one’s manuscript.

There are numerous tutorials online which could guide the creation of a video clip abstract, using commonly and frequently easily available computer software. Windows film Maker and Apple iMovie will be the many examples that are common. Types of video clip abstracts can be found from The BMJ. Here are a guidelines that are few making a video clip abstract. Writers could also desire to ask their institution’s press/media workplace for help.

• Movie abstracts must not keep going longer than 4 moments.
• This content and concentrate regarding the video clip must connect directly to the research which has been accepted for book, and may perhaps maybe perhaps not stray beyond the info. We suggest itself i.e. briefly outline the background/context of the study, present your research objective, outline the methods used, present the key results and then discuss the implications of the outcomes that you follow the same structure as the paper.
• The presentation and content of this video clip must be in a mode plus in terms that’ll be understandable and available to a broad medical market. The language that is main be English, but we welcome subtitles an additional language. Please avoid jargon that’ll not be acquainted to a wide audience that is medical and never make use of abbreviations.
• Writers often talk straight into the digital digital camera and/or provide a slideshow, but we enable the utilization of other appropriate artistic and sound product (such as for instance animations, videos, nevertheless photographs, figures, infographics). If you want to make use of product from formerly posted work or off their sources, please receive the appropriate permissions through the publisher that is relevant copyright owner.