SIDETRACKED SNAPCHAT and DRIVING(COMPONENT 2)

The situation of Maynard v. Snapshot, Inc., Case No. A20A1218 (decided 30, 2020), returned to the Georgia Court of Appeals october. This time around, the main focus associated with situation had been on a crucial dilemma of item obligation legislation in Georgia. The truth involved a role that the most popular social media app Snapchat played in a vehicle accident. The software includes a “speed filter” which allows you “snap” and publish an image that presents the speed of which the consumer is going. a motorist ended up being wanting to achieve the rate of 100 mph in order that she could capture that speed on a… Read more

Georgia (For Now) Resists The Most Recent Trend in Private Jurisdiction

The United States Supreme Court has taken steps to limit the jurisdictional reach of state courts in recent years. For the time being, the Georgia courts are resisting that trend. The United States Supreme Court has limited the reach of “general” personal jurisdiction in several recent cases. Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S.Ct. 746 (2014); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S.Ct. 1773 (2017). Particular individual jurisdiction exists whenever an out-of-state defendant purposefully directs tasks towards an in-state resident and the ones tasks bring about the claims at problem when you look at the lawsuit. General individual jurisdiction exists whenever an out-of-state defendant has… study more

THE END (QUITE) OF “PHYSICAL PRECEDENT” IN GEORGIA

One of many unique areas of choices regarding the Georgia Court of Appeals was the idea of “physical precedent.” The Georgia Court of Appeals relies on three-judge panels to decide cases with rare exceptions. If an individual associated with the judges on a three-judge panel concurred into the judgment not the panel’s thinking or, in the last few years, if an individual of this judges dissented, your choice associated with the court had been considered become “physical precedent.” It had been persuasive authority but maybe maybe maybe not binding authority in subsequent situations. The presence of such choices required appellate professionals to focus on whether a case… browse more

The Eleventh Circuit Takes A Tough Glance At Standing

Article III regarding the U.S. Constitution provides that federal courts can decide “cases” and “controversies.” The United States Supreme Court has interpreted that to imply that only a plaintiff who has got experienced an “injury in fact” has “standing” to bring instance in federal court. The Eleventh Circuit of late addressed the matter of standing in Cordoba v. DirecTV, LLC, Case No. 18-12077 (decided November 15, 2019). In Cordoba, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants violated the phone customer Protection Act (TCPA) because he received phone solicitations through the defendants despite having placed their cell phone number on a list… that is do-not-call. Study more

Standing to Sue for Unsolicited Texting

In Salcedo v. Hanna, Case No. 17-14077 (determined August 28, 2019), Mr. Salcedo had received just one text that is unsolicited from their previous attorney providing a price reduction on solutions. Mr. Salcedo sued Mr. Hanna alleging that the unsolicited text violated the phone customer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA). The TCPA imposes statutory damages of $500 per text, and that can be trebled for a text delivered knowingly or willfully. Mr. Salcedo desired to express a course of previous customers of Mr. Hanna that has additionally gotten such unsolicited texting. But, did Mr. Salcedo have actually “standing” to sue? The United… Browse more

Public Policy and Enforcing Contracts in Georgia

A few Georgians borrowed modest sums and guaranteed those loans utilising the profits they could recover on accidental injury claims. Payment of this loans ended up being contingent regarding the borrowers’ recovering on the accidental injury claims. The borrowers filed case up against the loan providers in Georgia state court alleging that the attention prices from the loans had been violated and usurious the Georgia Payday Lending Act and Industrial Loan Act. The lenders eliminated the situation to court that is federal argued that the mortgage agreements needed this type of lawsuit become filed in Illinois and in addition forbid course actions. But, could those needs be… browse more

Eleventh Circuit Limits Local Utility Monopolies

Can a water that is municipal use its monopoly to improve its gas sales to property owners? In different Power, Inc. v. City of LaGrange, Georgia, Case No. 18-11014 (determined 20, 2019), united states of america Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit responded “no. august” The City of LaGrange enjoys a monopoly on providing water solution inside the City of LaGrange as well as in portions of surrounding, unincorporated Troup County. The City additionally provides gas that is natural to those areas. In 2004, the Los Angeles Grange City Council passed an ordinance that supplied for brand new domestic construction outside associated with the town limitations of… browse more

Whenever Could You Apportion Obligation For A Group Action?

How will you apportion obligation among events similarly in charge of a determination? Quick solution: often, you don’t. Which was the clear answer reached by the usa Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Loudermilk, Case No. 16-17315 (decided July 22, 2019). The scenario involved the unsuccessful Buckhead Community Bank. After the bank failed, the FDIC, as receiver, desired to installment loans South Carolina carry the directors whom served regarding the loan approval committee responsible for presumably negligently having authorized specific loans that are risky. Fundamentally, the committee was held by a jury users accountable for approving four loans and granted the FDIC… find out more

Georgia Supreme Court Taking A Look At Data Breach Obligation

Information breaches in addition to disclosure that is unintentional of information are a lot within the news. Whether such occasions give increase to tort obligation is definitely a presssing issue being viewed because of the Georgia Supreme Court. Georgia Department of Work v. McConnell, Case Nos. S18G1316 and S18G1317 (decided May 20, 2019), included an unintentional disclosure by the Georgia Department of work regarding the private information of applicants for jobless benefits as well as other Department solutions. A Department worker had sent a message to about 1000 recipients that included a spreadsheet containing the private information, including social protection figures, of over 4500 candidates. One that is individual more