To test the hypothesis that irrational relationship beliefs related to perceived parent-adolescent relations and conflict resolution behaviors, Pearson Moment Correlations were calculated. The correlations among scores on the ICDS, CRS, MRS, FRS are presented in Table 1. 06, p>.236) and father-adolescent relations (r = .07, p>.229). 23, p< .001). Result showed that Interpersonal Rejection subscale of ICDS had highest correlation with CRS (r = -.44, p<. 001).

People whoever mediocre score decrease over the average have been branded because the higher dysfunctional relationship viewpoints category, and those that have the common score underneath the average was indeed branded as lowest dysfunctional relationships beliefs category

In this study, it was expected that individuals with high dysfunctional beliefs would endorse more less conflict resolution behaviors and perceive theft relations with parents negatively than those of low dysfunctional beliefs. To test this hypothesis, the high and low irrational group were defined by a median split on the ICDS score (median = ). Multivariate analysis of variances was performed to determine whether individuals having high irrational relationship beliefs vary from those not having irrational relationship beliefs across MRS, FRS and CRS. The result of analyses revealed that contrary to hypothesis, there was no significant group difference on mothers-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda = .971, F =.77, p>.696) and father-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda=.967, F = .88, p>.578). Consistent with the prediction, significant group difference was found on conflict resolution behaviors (Wilks’ Lambda = .896, F = 4.12, p< .001). When compared to individuals with high irrational beliefs about relationships, individuals with low irrational beliefs endorsed significantly more conflict resolution behaviors. Subsequent univariate results indicated that differences between low and high dysfunctional relationship beliefs groups were significant on focing other's needs (F = 9.77, p<.001), social adaptation (F = 9.82, p<.001) and anger management subscales (F = 3.97, p<.020) of CRS (Table 2).

Sure-enough, bad and you will reasonable peak connections anywhere between impaired relationship opinions and argument quality behaviors was indeed found (roentgen = –

Stepwise regression analyses was basically did to examine circumstances that predict perceived parents-adolesents relations and you can disagreement solution behavior because based details. Separate variables that were not as much as data was in fact sex, age, sorts of home, father and mother relationships, informative level of moms and dads, level of sibling and you may cousin additionally the purchase out-of birth, family members build and you will dysfunctional dating thinking. In order to dictate you can easily separate details, basic, Beta loads was calculated for the attempt. The greatest adding independent variables to the built varying variance have been incorporated investigation. Process was concluded immediately following also all the independent details one to sign up to the new explained variance. While the intercourse, informative level of moms and dads and kind out of house have been categorical, these blackfling inloggen were added onto regression study just after getting dummy coded (0 otherwise step 1).

Beta weights showed that beliefs about interpersonal rejection was the most significant predictor for conflict resolution behaviors. Results also showed that gender and the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were predictors of conflict resolution behaviors. Stepwise regression analysis to determine the best model in predicting for conflict resolution behaviors was completed in three stages. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection was entered in Step 1. The contribution of beliefs about interpersonal rejection was statistically significant, accounting for 20 % of the total variances, F = , p< .001. When gender was entered into the equation in Step 2, explained variance of CRS increased to 27 % from 20 %, F = , p< .001. Gender difference was found between men and women on conflict resolution behaviors. Women had significantly higher scores than men in CRS scores (t = 5.05, p<. 001).

In Step 3, the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were included and this variable explained 3 % of the variance, F = , p< .001. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection, interpersonal misperception and gender accounted for 31% of the variance.