1857.

3rd.-The brand new last wedding out-of Court “Crown and Anchor” An excellent.O.F. had been recognized by a food on Uncle. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied the brand new settee, and it also was stated that the latest Legal after that contained ninety users.

Jan

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you will J. Bayly ended up being decided new members of the general public Collection Panel.

p. 207 Your body away from an excellent whale, which had been pulled at Winterton, was being exhibited toward Chapel Simple.

The new Rev. W. D. Wade, brand new minister off St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before you leave Southsea, become served with a wallet from ?61.

twenty-first.-The “Sisters” got from inside the accident which have among the stone piers from this new Connection, which it got a lot more broken.

Feb. 4th.-An Anti-Taxation meeting got kept within City Hall. The latest Gran presided, as well as the pursuing the took part in what is going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be the fresh mover inside number.

Feb. twenty-first.-A beneficial “Poor’s Price” conference was held at Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may an answer protesting up against the 1s. 6d. quarterly rates is accompanied. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you will F. Starling talked about the subject, given that make of one’s Taguig in Philippines brides Guardians are defended by the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among the many Panel.

Feb. 25th.-A case and that thrilled significant attention, was actually read during the County Legal, Tolhouse-hall, before Courtroom (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The newest plaintiff was Mr. John Cobb, leather-based merchant, for which Mr. C. H. Chamberlin seemed; this new defendants was Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you may G. D. Palmer, have been illustrated by Mr. J. L. Cufaude. Brand new plaintiff stated that he had been a candidate into the office of Councillor to the elizabeth such as for example from the solicitation out-of Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you may G. D. Palmer. At the time the guy became an applicant the guy distinctly told all of them he would not fork out out-of his very own pouch even more than simply ?10 towards the expenditures of the election, plus it was understood that the Liberal group, that the guy belonged, create sign-up others. The evening before the election he gotten a quotation out-of exactly what the expenses were more likely, plus in outcome of he at the same time spotted each other Mr. Burroughs and Mr. G. D. Palmer. That guess, the guy considered, amounted to help you on the ?45, since memberships altogether amounted to help you but ?42. Immediately following specific conversation it wanted to hold your harmless of one’s number of the costs that might meet or exceed the sum of the subscribed, and then he and you can Mr. Burroughs after that ran p. 208 on Panel-area of the Northern-ward, where Mr. Burroughs said they had generated plans due to their pal John Cobb profitable the marketplace-ward. The costs of election, that he (new plaintiff) lost, amounted entirely so you’re able to ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, therefore, that he now claimed regarding defendants is ?16 1s. 7d.-The fresh new plaintiff, during the cross-test of the Mr. Cufaude, accepted you to ?39 of the whole matter is actually to have – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated that if, once the plaintiff stated, new defendants got considering your a vow to your surplus costs, brand new ensure need to come in writing. And, and in case the data try true, and this, not, he debated, it absolutely was impossible to the plaintiff to recover, inasmuch when he himself got anticipate you to definitely a corner away from the full costs try to own – -, that has been an illegal act.-Mr. Chamberlin debated the plaintiff, immediately after receiving the brand new vow from the defendants, acted just abreast of the fresh new faith of the vow, and that ergo, as they had joined on an involvement to invest the money, they were liable. The bucks, furthermore, was not invested because of the plaintiff, but by the panel designated to conduct the brand new election, and you can up until the election is actually more than, brand new plaintiff wasn’t aware the currency got become spent into the – -.-Their Honour told you it was clear brand new make certain need already been written down. He had been off advice, also, the plaintiff wasn’t bound to spend the money for illegal charge, and therefore he might not promote his step for money he stated.-The latest plaintiff is actually, correctly, non-eliminate.